1. The Defendants’ real estate indicated in Section B, “A indicating the real estate to be delivered to each of the Defendant” in the attached Table to the Plaintiff.

1. Claim against the defendant B

A. The Plaintiff indicated the claim is the Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association established with the area of the project, the area of which is one hundred and twenty-six thousand square meters in Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

Since the Suwon Market approved and publicly announced the management and disposal plan for the plaintiff's rearrangement project, the above defendant who occupied and used the pertinent real estate as stated in Section B of "Indication of Real Estate to be delivered to the defendant" located in the plaintiff's project implementation district is obligated to deliver the said

(b) Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Claim against Defendant C and D

A. Facts of recognition 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s housing redevelopment improvement project project that has the area of the project with the area of the project with the area of the housing redevelopment project with the area of the zone of Suwon-si E, Suwon-si. (hereinafter “instant project”).

(2) For the purpose of this, the public inspection announcement date for the designation of the rearrangement zone of the instant project is May 6, 2008; the authorization date for the implementation of the project is June 15, 2012; the authorization date for the implementation of the project is June 18, 2012; the authorization date for the implementation of the project is June 8, 2012; the authorization date for the implementation of the project; and the authorization date for the implementation of the project and the notification date is June 8, 2018.

3) Defendant C and D occupy and use each of the real estate stated in Section B of the “Indication of the Real Estate to be extradited to each Defendant” in the attached Table B located in the Plaintiff’s business area. The purport of the whole of the arguments and arguments is as follows: (a) there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition; (b) there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition; (c) Nos. 1, 2, 3-1, 3, 4

B. The main text of Article 81(1) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) provides that “When the authorization on a management and disposition plan is publicly announced, the owner, superficies, leaseer, etc. of the previous land or building shall not use the previous land or building or benefit therefrom until the date of the public announcement of relocation under Article 86.”

Examining the above facts in light of the above provisions, it is against the instant business.