Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 19, 2015, the Defendant driven a low-speed car around C around 08:45, and led the Defendant to make a right-hand turn at a speed of about 10km away from the fungcheon-dong, Seocheon-dong, Seocheon-dong, Seocheon-dong, to the flue zone of the E real estate D.

It is not divided between India and the roadway, and there were many students driving the same place at the time, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the motor vehicle with the right and the right and the right of the front and the right of the front and the right of the front while driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, even though the Defendant neglected to do so and went to the left part of the Victim F ( South, 13 years old) who was protruding from the front door of the Mancheon-dong, the right side of the victim F (hereinafter referred to as the “F”) who was protruding from the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle at the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle, thereby suffering from an injury on the left side of approximately 2 weeks of treatment, the Defendant stopped to the victim F and escaped without taking measures such as aiding the damaged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Medical certificate (F);

1. Application of the CCTV-cape Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photographs and field photographs (up to 8 times);

1. Article 5-3 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Penalty) concerning the crime;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Articles 55 and 55(1)6 of the said Act)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the Defendant sustained the victim’s “injury” due to the instant accident.

It is difficult to see that there was no need to take relief measures, and there was no intention to flee.

The argument is asserted.

판시 증거에 따라 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 피고인이 사고 당시 ‘ 쿵’...