logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2017. 12. 21. 선고 2017누68 판결
원심 판단은 적법하여 이 사건 처분은 신뢰보호의 원칙 또는 신의성실의 원칙에 위반되지 않음[각하]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon District Court-2012-Gu -1599 ( August 30, 2017)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho Jae-2012- Daejeon-2364 (Law No. 12, 2016)

Title

The judgment of the court below is legitimate and the disposition of this case does not violate the principle of trust protection or the principle of trust and good faith.

Summary

The judgment of the court below is legitimate and the disposition of this case does not violate the principle of trust protection or the principle of trust and good faith, and the imposition of additional tax is unlawful, so all appeals filed by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed and the reasons for the judgment are cited in accordance with Article 4

Related statutes

Article 104-3 (1) of the Income Tax Act

Cases

Daejeon High Court-2017-Nu-68

Plaintiff

박@@ 외 11

Defendant

@@세무서장

Conclusion of Pleadings

November 30, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

December 21, 2017

Text

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The grounds for appeal by the Plaintiffs and the Defendant are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court is examined, the fact-finding and judgment in the first instance court are recognized as legitimate. Accordingly, the grounds for appeal by this court are as stated in the grounds for the first instance court judgment in addition to the corresponding grounds for the first instance judgment as follows. Therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

○ 4th 13th 13th 13th 1st 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3

The first half of the disposition of this case (hereinafter referred to as "the disposition of this case") is "(hereinafter referred to as "the disposition of this case", and in particular, only the imposition of each additional tax in each of the above dispositions is referred to as "the imposition of each additional tax of this case")".

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claims are justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed, without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and each appeal by the plaintiffs and the defendant is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow