beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
1. As a matter of the operation of the C Merchants’ Association, the Defendant did not have good reputation by punishing D and Si expenses.
On March 19, 2013, the Defendant found the above D, which heard that the said D had spreaded salt on a neighboring old store in the E market located in Asan-si, Asan-si, E, and followed this, followed it, and the Victim F (V, 57 years old) reported this to 112.
The Defendant, on the ground that the victim reported the above D’s letter, made a public insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim, by making the victim 4 times, “packer shall be a woman, she will take a view of her face,” while the market merchants and customers are being able to protect the victim’s face.”
2. As to the above facts charged in the judgment of the court of this case, the defendant consistently denies the police from the police to the court that he had expressed the same desire as the facts charged.
However, among the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, there are statements of D, F, G, and H as evidence that seem to correspond to the above facts charged.
However, according to the records, the following circumstances are as follows: (i) at the time of the first investigation by the police, F made a statement to the Defendant by assaulting D and assaulting the Defendant, “I do not have to do so,” and the Defendant made a statement to 112 that I would have expressed that I would have “I would have to do so,” and that I would have expressed that I would have expressed that I would have been able to do so, and that I would have expressed that I would have expressed that I would have expressed that I would have expressed that I would have expressed that I would have been a woman before the misunderstanding of the video after the recording of the video was completed; (ii) D and F would have stated that I would have reported that I would have expressed that I would have expressed that I would have been 1:3 and that I would have reported to F would have expressed that I would have been 112 before the report was made by the Defendant on the video.