Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B around 09:50 on August 29, 201, the dry field leased from the victim A(55 years of age) located in Gunsan-si D on the ground that he voluntarily extracted trees, such as scrob-type tree, from the scrob-type type, etc. on the ground that the said victim arbitrarily extracted trees from the scromatic scke, etc., and caused injury to the victim, such as the scromatic scke, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant A by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The gist of the facts charged against Defendant A was as follows: (a) the Defendant, at the same time and place as indicated in its reasoning, set up against the assault by the victim B (the age of 55) and carried the body of the said victim over once by hand, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as catitis, which requires treatment for about three weeks.

2. As to the above facts charged by Defendant A, the Defendant asserts that there was no scambling the victim, and that the victim immediately reported the above facts to 112 when the victim was scambling the Defendant.

3. In conclusion, there is a statement in B’s investigative agency and this court as evidence that seems to correspond to the above facts charged.

B, as stated in its reasoning, I first stated that the Defendant, who was pushed the Defendant, was also tightly pushed the Defendant, and was tightly pushed the Defendant, and reported to the police box in the state of being pushed down by the Defendant.

However, according to the records of this case, the Defendant: (a) received a final and conclusive judgment in favor of Party B, such as the delivery of land to Party B; (b) reported to Party B on August 29, 201 to E box; and (c) the Defendant reported to Party B on August 29, 201; and (d) reported to Party B on 112 on the same day.