(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.10.29 2012고정5180

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.10.29 2012고정5180

공무집행방해

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

(1)A is the primary employee, Defendant 2)B is the head employee, and Defendant 1B.

(2) At around 09:00 on July 31, 2012, 2012, 200, 200: (a) A voluntarily acted in the police station and office located in Gangnam Police Station located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 998, 200; (b) Defendant B voluntarily acted in the police station as a assault case; (c) “When she moves in the police station, she will be resolved, she will have been moving in the police station, she will be in the Seoul Special Police Agency.” Accordingly, the victim E (44) of the 4 criminal team in charge of criminal affairs and work on duty should be examined, and therefore, the victim E (44) of the victim of the 4 criminal team in charge of criminal affairs and work on duty should be investigated, and therefore, the Defendant would be a criminal and criminal offender at the office and inform the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties if he interferes with legitimate public duties.

(1) Defendant 1 continued to keep the criminal and the entrance door at hand, and forced the victim’s body into the criminal and office, and took the victim’s body, and took the victim’s body. Defendant 1 expressed her desire to arrest the victim as a flagrant offender after notifying Defendant 1 of the instant doctrine with respect to the obstruction of performance of official duties, and the same 2) stated that “I will interfere with the arrest of the victim E and the arrested police officer, who continued to perform legitimate official duties, by threatening Defendant 1 to arrest the victim as a flagrant offender after notifying her of the instant doctrine.”

Accordingly, for about 15 minutes, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate performance of the victim E's official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. The application of laws and regulations on police statements to E.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원성남지원 2020.12.16 2020고단583

-서울동부지방법원 2013.12.24 2013고단2600

-서울동부지방법원 2013.04.04 2012고단1177

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.08.07 2015고단1363

-대전지방법원 2014.08.21 2014고단2234