The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is in de facto marital relationship with the victim C from around 1995.

At around 03:10 on November 14, 2013, the Defendant, at the house of the Defendant and the victim, operated a passenger car under the name of the victim SP in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (a) applied a car in the name of the victim, and did not pay taxes, etc.; (b) applied to the issue that the Defendant did not pay taxes, etc. to the victim; (c) applied to the victim during the dispute with the victim; (d) fluencing the victim’s eye with a bad finger, thereby threateninging the victim as with the victim’s eye; and (d) brought the victim with a sound knife (21cm on the knth of the knife) which was a deadly weapon in the front line, and brought the victim a knife to the front door.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim with a deadly weapon.

2. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the victim testified that it would be sufficient to say that the victim's statement was not reliable in the victim's statement to the investigative agency, considering the unique characteristics of the relationship between the defendant and the victim, although the victim has consistently stated in the facts charged, he/she brought about a knife knife and brought about a knife knife with the victim's eye, and brought about a knife with the knife with the front door, while the victim partly reversed his/her statement in the court below, while the victim took part of his/her statement in the court below, he/she brought about the victim's knife with the victim's knife with the victim's knife with the victim's knife with the victim's knife with the victim's knife as stated in the facts charged.