1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant does not specify the date and time completion date of the instant indictment from around August 2016 to February 24, 2017. However, in light of the purport of the indictment that is inferred through all the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the completion date of the crime is recognized until February 24, 2017. However, even if the completion date of the crime is recognized without going through the amendment process, it is determined that the Defendant does not have any substantial disadvantage in guaranteeing the Defendant’s right to defense, taking into account the extent that the res judicata effect of the final and conclusive judgment on a single comprehensive crime (business crime) such as the instant case extends to the extent that the final and conclusive judgment extends, and thus, the Defendant ex officio recognizes the same criminal facts

In Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, 2 and 5'C', 6 rooms with aggressions, and so-called the so-called "news room", commercial sex acts have been arranged for commercial sex acts by allowing many unspecified male customers to engage in commercial sex acts, and receiving KRW 80,000 or KRW 10,000 from the price of commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or E;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Selective Commercial Sex Acts, concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc.

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic.

4. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant’s wrong and misjudgments the Defendant’s wrong decision; (b) the Defendant does not engage in a regular business such as directly employing sexual traffic women; and (c) the profit earned from the instant crime appears not to have any particular criminal history, in addition to Defendant 1’s fine, it appears that the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (d) other criminal acts, such as the circumstances after the crime.