Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for a period of one and half years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a wing-III truck.

On February 18, 2019, at around 09:31, the Defendant moved back the above vehicle parked on the road in front of the “D” located in the Gangnam-gun C.

In such cases, the driver had a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents by safely driving the steering gear, such as operating the steering gear and operation of the steering gear in a way that well sees the right and the right and the right and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and left the front part of the victim E (V, 69 years of age) who walked behind the vehicle of the above defendant due to the negligence of the defendant, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor.

Ultimately, at around 10:38 of the same day, the Defendant caused the victim to die due to serious damage to the ebbal damage in the G Hospital emergency room located in the G Hospital F in the Republic of Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. A traffic accident report (1), (2), field photograph of a traffic accident, each internal investigation report, and a death diagnosis report;

1. Application of statutes concerning criminal records;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution has a criminal record of a fine of the same kind for the defendant, and the crime of this case is committed against the defendant, considering the method and result of the crime, etc., and there are no criminal records other than those of the defendant, and there are no criminal records other than those of the defendant, and there are no criminal records other than those of the defendant, and since the vehicle driven by the defendant at the time of the traffic accident in this case, it appears that considerable damage to the bereaved family of the victim would have been caused by the vehicle covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, which has been agreed with the bereaved family of the victim, and the defendant's mistake