Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B car truck truck truck vehicle.

On August 2, 2019, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on August 18:25, 2019, and continued to drive the intersection in front of the “D” restaurant “D”, which is located in Seocheon City C, by straighting the intersection from the wing-si side to the wing-do.

At this point, there was a duty of care to safely drive according to the traffic signal to the driver of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and entered the intersection as it was due to the negligence of entering the stop signal, and the part of the victim E(34 years old) driving in front of the car driving in the direction of the Defendant’s right-hand port to left at the right-hand turn in accordance with the new code was received as the front-hander of the freight vehicle of the Defendant.

After all, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence to the victim E a bodily injury, such as an injury to the victim E, such as the escape of the right upper mouth, which requires treatment for about eight weeks, and injury to the victim F (34 years of age) who was accompanied by the said car for about eight weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Application of the actual situation survey report, site photograph, each diagnosis report, and criminal records-related statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. The crimes of this case under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, based on the method and result, etc., are committed against the defendant. However, there is no previous conviction against the defendant, and since the vehicle operated by the defendant at the time of the traffic accident in this case was covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, it seems that considerable damage has been caused to the victims. The defendant agreed with the victims.