A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 30, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Incheon District Court on January 30, 2012, and on June 8, 2012, the records of fraud other than the termination of the enforcement of the sentence in the Incheon Detention House are more than ten

[2012 Highest 2139]

1. On August 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 16:40, at the “E” operated by the victim D of Heung-gu Seoul Building C, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) ordered the payment as if the payment was made; (c) however, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to settle the price.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was provided with the victim with 7 Madro-ro roasing a total of 40,000 won at the market price in the same place.

2. On August 14, 2012, around 00:45, the Defendant ordered “Hhop” operated by the victim G of the Heung-gu Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F building G to pay the amount as if he would have paid the amount. However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the amount.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was provided by the victim with 10 beer and 10 beer and 15 beer and 1 beer and 1 beer and 1 beer and 1 beer and 62,000 won in total at the market price in the same place.

3. On August 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 19:30, at the “Khop” operated by the second-class victim J of the second floor of the Heung-gu I building in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) ordered the payment as if the payment was made; (c) however, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to settle the payment.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received from the victim 4 diseases of 1,700cc. 1, 1700cc. 20cc., 500c. 7 c. 700cc., and 4 disease from the victim.

4. The Defendant, around 16:00 on August 17, 2012, had no intention or ability to settle the price for using the PC in fact in the “NPC” operated by Heung-gu L Building Victim M, Young-gu, Kui-gu, Hoju.

Nevertheless, the defendant is paying the price to the employee of the above business establishment as if he would pay it normally, and is provided with the jobs.