logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2013.10.11 2013고단538
유해화학물질관리법위반(환각물질흡입)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

During the period of seizure of principalboards (Evidence No. 1), vinyls (Evidence No. 2), finites (Evidence No. 2), and find boxes.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] On August 17, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on May 26, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daejeon Correctional District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

From around 10:00 to 14:47 on July 29, 2013, the Defendant, in the D Inncium 205 room in Jincia C, purchased in advance, put 7 pinc "incinc" 150g "incinck", an industrial key part of which contains Toluene, into a vinyl, and inhaled toxic chemicals over about 30 minutes in a sincinary form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Police seizure records;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: References to criminal records, investigation reports (the previous records of a suspect and reports attached to a written judgment) and application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 58 subparagraph 3 of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act and Article 43 (1) of the same Act on criminal facts;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act not only has the record of having been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor, etc. for the same kind of crime on several occasions, but also having committed the instant crime without being informed of the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on August 17, 2012 and without being informed of the completion of the execution of the sentence on May 26, 2013.

The punishment shall be determined as per the disposition, taking into consideration the fact that the defendant reflects his mistake in depth, the occupation, age, circumstances leading to the crime, etc. of the defendant.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow