logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.01.14 2015고단7223
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties against the victim B and the victim C on October 13, 2015, is bound to enjoy on the six-lane line in front of the knowledge and information short area located in 57 at the Incheon Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon at around 23:30 on October 13, 2015.

Miscellaneous도요도요

“I am at the risk of her own eye, I am saw “I am fe, bitch fe, bitch fe, bitch fe,” and am knee at the right right kne, assaulted the back part of the victim B (e.g., South, 32 years old) once to 4-5 times in the middle of the back, and obstructed the legitimate performance of official duties of police officers C ( South, 49 years old) and C (n.e., the victim C (n., South, 49 years old) who was feased about 10 times in the middle of the feas, and who was feased.g., the police officer B and C’s duty to protect.

2. The Defendant was arrested in the act of committing a crime under suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties in relation to the victim E at the above time, place, and was transferred to the training police station type and the criminal team investigation waiting room located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon on October 14, 2015, as the cause of Yeonsu-gu Incheon on October 14, 2015.

Defendant 01:10 on the same day, he / she calls

1.3 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2.2

In doing so, “Abdoing the pedal,” the pedal of the victim E ( South, 35 years old) who was trying to restrain it, thereby interfering with the legitimate performance of public duties concerning the duties of police officers E in relation to the protection measures of police officers by walking the back of the victim E ( South, 35 years old) once.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each police statement protocol to E, C, and B;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration of favorable circumstances among the following grounds for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [the type of decision] shall interfere with the performance of official duties.

arrow