logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.03.31 2016고단1099
특수협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Special intimidation Defendant: (a) around 15:00 on April 28, 2010, the victim D (45 taxes) located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu, the head of the party headquarters operated by E (45 taxes) prior to the occurrence of the damage, saying, “I ambling the disturbance at the Gu of the party headquarters, I ambling the victim; and (b) I ambling the victim.”

The term "welves." The flaves off the upper and upper part of the body, flaves off the body and the part of the body, and flaves the body, which were dangerous objects that were placed in the stalth of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body

“.....”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, upon receiving a report from 112, that there was a person who franks in the billiard room at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), reported to G about the manner in which G members belonging to the Busan Police Station F District would hear the statements from the relevant persons, and reported to G about the circumstances.

nishes, in order to put them down.

The police of the Republic of Korea are Dratia.

The expression " may be punished for insult at the time of taking a bath against a police officer" from the Inspector G.

In the event of hearing the word “,” the bit of bitbit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of oil.

“The Hashes described “,” and the chest of G was found to have been one time for drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to G or D;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Relevant Articles 284, 283(1) (a) (a point of assaulting carrying dangerous articles), Article 136(1) (a) (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act and choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 Section 1 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.

arrow