logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.09.30 2016고단1533
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the Defendants did not pay a fine, each of them is KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 6, 2016, the Defendants: (a) smoked from “G main points of the operation of the Ulsan-gu E Victim F (39 tax)” to the “G main points of the operation of the Ulsan-gu E Victim F (39 tax) around 21:50 on May 6, 2016.

The Defendants stated that the main employee H was to be gold, as the defect, “h. Chewing. Chewing........................ female customers in the name on the side are demanded to be able to be able to enjoy it.......”

(a) The same sound as the bit of a bitch;

"Abrut" and satisfying a disturbance, such as shouldering illness, in dispute with the behaviors.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. The Defendants, in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (damage, etc. to common property) destroyed the 1st place and the 110,000 won, which is the victim’s ownership, by inserting up one set of the pre-paid bulletin board (up to KRW 110,00,000,000,000,000,000,000 won) and the cafeteria floor.

Accordingly, the defendants jointly damaged the victim's property.

3. On May 6, 2016, around 22:10, around 22:10 and around 112 reported at the place prescribed in paragraph (1) of this Article, the police officer J ( South, 28 years old) tried to verify the Defendants’ personal information in order to verify the Defendant’s personal information, and the Defendant A expressed that “I would like to sing down why they would have been wres to wres? wres to wres? wres to wres? wres to wres to wres? wres to wres to wres and wres to the Defendant’s chest.”

Defendant

B Dubly, “the same bit of bitch bitch bitch,” can be cut off.

Along with the number of times, the brush theory "......" and the chest part of the J was pushed down by the shoulder and the ship.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of the J's criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to J and H;

1. A statement of F and K;

1. Each receipt (No. 9 on the evidence list);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, No. 1 of field photographs (Evidence List 1);

1. Obstruction of the relevant Article of the Criminal Act and of the choice of punishment: Article 314(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act;

arrow