The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On April 9, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 14:20 on April 14, 2014, at a D office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, brought a dispute over the issue of the victim E's claims and obligations; (b) left the office, left the victim's chest and arms; and (c) sustained the victim's face four times due to drinking, with the victim's injury, such as an inner fluoral dysium, salt, etc., requiring treatment for 14 days.

2. In a judgment of conviction in a criminal trial, the conviction ought to be based on evidence of probative value, which leads to the judge’s conviction that is beyond a reasonable doubt, to such a degree that the facts charged are true. Therefore, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof fails to sufficiently reach the extent that such conviction would lead to the prosecutor’s conviction, the conviction should be determined with the benefit of the defendant even if

The Defendant consistently denies the instant crime from the investigative agency to the court. The evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case refers to the E’s testimony by the Defendant, E’s legal statement from the witness E, the police interrogation protocol against the Defendant (2 times) of the police interrogation protocol against the Defendant, the E’s protocol of statement of the police officer, and the written statement of E preparation.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

There is each indication that is consistent with the part and degree of injury as indicated in the judgment among the injury diagnosis certificate for the preparation of the F medical doctor and the certificate of medical treatment for oriental medical doctor G.

However, in the written statement prepared on April 9, 2014, on the day of the instant case, E stated that “the Defendant made 4 times the head and the scambling of her head and the scambling by hand.” However, after receiving a report 112 on the same day, E stated that “the police officer (e.g., security H and slope I) called ice ice ice ice ice ices two times” (the on-site report of the violence case, the on-site report of the investigation record, and the 8th page of the investigation record), and again, in the police witness investigation conducted on the same day, the Defendant stated that “the Defendant her two scamblings twice each

E The police statement, investigation record, etc.