1. The plaintiff A company:

A. Defendant C and Defendant D jointly share KRW 1,872,00 and their amount from April 8, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) Plaintiff A (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”)

(2) The Plaintiff Company B (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”) is a copyright holder of “I(former J)”, which is a computer program, which is a program used in the business of shooting, printing, printing, drawing, structural interpretation, and industrial design.

3) Defendant C Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”).

(B) The purpose of Defendant D is to conduct the business of manufacturing, manufacturing and selling products, and selling glass products. Defendant D is the representative director of the Defendant Company, Defendant E’s research institute head, and Defendant F’s employee of the Defendant Company. B. The Defendants’ copyright infringement 1) without the Plaintiff Company’s permission from September 13, 2013 to April 8, 2015, 3, Defendant D, Defendant E, and Defendant F, a computer program owned by the Plaintiff Company A, a copyright, from May 12, 2014 to April 8, 2015, copied 1 and 2, a computer program owned by the Plaintiff Company A, a copyright, in the Defendant Company’s office, and used it for business purposes.

2) Without the permission of the Plaintiff Company, Defendant D, Defendant E, and Defendant F were issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for each fine, and KRW 500,000,000 for Defendant D, E, and Defendant F were issued on computers established in the Defendant Company’s office from May 12, 2014 to April 8, 2015, where the Plaintiff Company B copied three computer programs, which are copyrighted by the Plaintiff Company B, for business purposes. (iii) The Defendants were issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for Defendant D, E, and Defendant F, and KRW 50,000,000,000,000, as a result of such act in violation of the Copyright Act as stated in the separate criminal facts. The summary order became final and conclusive on December 5, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1- 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Defendant A and Defendant D with respect to the Plaintiff Company.