logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.09.09 2020가단102906
손해배상(지)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 35,700,000 to Plaintiff A, and KRW 330,000 to Plaintiff B, and Plaintiff Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff Company is a copyright holder of F et al.’s software, a computer program, F et al., and the Plaintiff Company is a copyright holder of I, J, K, and L et al., an integrated compression management program, and the Plaintiff Company C is a copyright holder of M et al., a computer program.

B. Defendant D is the representative of “O” established for the purpose of manufacturing machinery for special purpose (hereinafter “O”), and Defendant E was an employee of the non-party company, and was prohibited from acquiring and using for business copies of a program made by infringing the copyright of the program. Defendant E acquired copies made by infringing the copyright of each program (hereinafter “each program of this case”) in the non-party company from the date when it was not paid to March 5, 2019 to the date when it was acquired from the date to March 5, 2019 by infringing the copyright of each program owned by the plaintiffs in the non-party company, and infringed the plaintiffs’ copyright by using them for business purpose, and Defendant D did not exercise due care and supervision to prevent the violation, even though Defendant E violated each copyright of the plaintiffs.

Patent Act No. 65,950,000 Won 2 B Q65,000 Won 3 CCR 6312,000 Won 18

C. The Defendants are the District Court Decision 2019 High Court Decision 2019 High Court Decision 7737 Decided November 7, 2019.

Defendant D was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 2,000,000, and KRW 500,000,000, due to a violation of the Copyright Act, such as the description of the claim.

【In the absence of dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap 1 through 4 evidence, and the fact-finding results with respect to the S Association President as an incorporated association of this court, the whole purport of pleadings.

2. According to the above facts, the defendants acquired copies of each program of this case in which the plaintiffs have copyright, and used them in the non-party company's business to infringe on the plaintiffs' copyright. Thus, the defendants shall compensate the plaintiffs for each damage they suffered.

arrow