The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable as it is too unfasible that the punishment of the lower court (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and one hundred and twenty hours of community service) is too unfased.

2. According to the judgment, the defendant recognized the crime of this case, there is no record that the defendant was punished for the same crime, and there is no record that the defendant was punished for more severe punishment than the fine, and the defendant's consent of this case is type-approved after specifying that the former name consent of this case is used for PE (Pool) force materials at the time of obtaining type approval from the FITI testing and research institute under the Ship Safety Act. The defendant appears not to have produced the life consent of this case for the purpose of deceiving the victims from the beginning. Although the former name consent of this case is insufficient in function, it is not in conformity with international standards and safety problems, the defendant's age, occupation, and all other matters concerning the sentencing specified in the records and arguments, the prosecutor's assertion of the judgment of the court below is not reasonable.

3. Therefore, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.