(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.06.05 2013가단99399

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.06.05 2013가단99399

손해배상

Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 27,017,00 as well as 20% per annum from February 26, 2015 to the day of full payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 23, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a sales contract with the Defendant to purchase for KRW 500 million (hereinafter “instant sales contract”). The Plaintiff concluded a sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with the Defendant to purchase for KRW 223 square meters and its second-story detached housing (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. The Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer of the instant building on February 22, 2013 pursuant to the instant sales contract, and was handed over by the Defendant around that time.

C. However, Iung in the ceiling and the wall of the instant building due to the occurrence of fruit and water leakage, the cause is as follows.

(1) Under the design drawing, the thickness of brick concrete is 200 meters and polyethylene (PE) film is constructed, but the wall was constructed with the thickness of 150 meters, and the film of polyethyl (PE) was not constructed, which caused the lack of short-heat performance.

(2) The lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part, and the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part, which did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on proof, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. In so doing, the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

The lack of the thickness of the above brick concrete and the defects of polyethylene (PE) film construction can be repaired by adding pressure ioners and rockboards to a single heat, and by performing polyethylene (PE) film, and the defects of the wall parts around the above windows can be repaired by removing the brickd parts, re-using concrete, and adding single heat materials as above. The above repair costs are total of KRW 23,017,000.

E. Meanwhile, on May 27, 2013, the Plaintiff’s fee of KRW 3,60,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won,

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2015.12.22 2014나2431

-의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.09.23 2019가단95389

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.02.14 2016가단18793

-대구지방법원 2018.05.16 2017나8232

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.10 2016가단148621