logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.10.10 2013고단897
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

4,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 2012, the Defendant issued the name of "A," "A, a diplomatic and trade division belonging to the President," to the neighboring persons, and was actually appointed as a member of the social integration committee. On May 2012, the Defendant was asked to the effect that "A, during the telephone conversations with the victim B who was believed to be in the above position, is assigned to the Cheongju-si Office, and I wish to be tried by undetained." The Defendant received money from the victim, but the victim was a virtual figure without any intention or ability to be tried by undetained, and the victim was asked to receive money from the victim to receive money from the victim, and the victim was considered to have received money from the victim under the name of 30 million won and received additional money from the victim to 200 million won and received money from the victim to 200 million won."

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Each protocol of prosecutorial statement concerning D, E, and B;

1. Application of an investigation report (A name attached report/B accompanied by a photograph of text messages sent by A), reply to a request for fact-finding (Social Integration Committee), application of Acts and subordinate statutes of reply to account transaction details;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 111 (1) of the Attorney-at-Law Act (a point of receiving money or valuables on the pretext of solicitation of a case);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (the punishment provided for in the judgment heavier than that of the punishment shall be imposed, but the choice of imprisonment shall be imposed);

1. The defendant of this case for sentencing under the latter part of Article 116 of the Attorney-at-Law Act.

arrow