All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, one year of imprisonment, one year of suspended sentence, two years of suspended sentence) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. Each of the instant crimes is deemed to have been directly involved in the so-called “phishing crime” or kept an access medium used for the so-called “phishing crime.” The instant crime requires strict punishment for persons who participated in the instant crime due to the serious social harm.

However, in light of various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., in light of the following: (a) the Defendants took part in each of the instant offenses; (b) the Defendants did not want to punish the Defendants; and (c) the Defendants did not want to receive juvenile protective disposition several times; (d) the Defendants did not have any criminal record against the Defendants; and (e) the Defendants did not have any criminal record against the Defendants, and (e) other various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the Defendants’ age, sexual behavior, and circumstances after the crime.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal against the Defendants is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.