logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원의성지원 2015.08.12 2014가단1869
토지인도 등
Text

1. The Defendant points out of 1,487 square meters in the attached Form 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 27, and 7, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 18, 2012, the Plaintiff acquired ownership of the remainder 1/2 of the instant land on November 7, 2012 with respect to one-half shares of 1,487 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. The part (B) of the ship connecting each point in order to each point of (a) the main roof of the main roof attached to the attached Form 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 27, and 7, which is owned by the Defendant, is installed in each of the instant land, in which the main abandonment of the part (a) connected each point of (b) part of the ship, 9,10, 28, 29, 30, 30, and 9, are invaded on each of the instant land. The Defendant occupied the portion (b) of each of the instant land, which connects each point of (b) part (a) of the same drawings attached to the instant land, 4,5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 26, 25, and 4; and (c) the 16, 17, 18, 19, and 16.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1, the result of the survey and appraisal on the head of the Cheongong-gun branch office of the Korea Intellectual Property Corporation in Daegu and North Korea, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts found in the determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant, without any title, installed a main abandonment on the part (B) of the instant land, which connects the points of which are indicated in the separate sheet No. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 27, and 7, among the instant land owned by the Plaintiff, each of which is indicated in the separate sheet No. 9, 10, 28, 29, 30, 30, and 9, each of which is indicated in the same map No. 9, 10, 28, 29, 30, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 26, 25, 27, and 4, and each of the aforementioned parts (B) with the same map No. 9, 10, 28, 19, 196, and 29; barring any special circumstances, the Defendant occupied the aforementioned parts (2) and 97, 2).

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.

arrow