beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 5,00,000 for Plaintiff A; KRW 2,00,000 for Plaintiff C; and KRW 1,000,00 for Plaintiff B, D, and E, respectively.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiffs were the attorneys-at-law who were detained in Nonparty G as the so-called “F case” upon the request of the Committee on Human Rights in Y, and upon the request of the Committee on Human Rights in order to request H’s defense at the request of the National Intelligence Service (hereinafter referred to as the “National Assembly”) that “the number of female students H was detained in the joint newspaper center for several months during which they met a detention house.”
B. G was a Chinese national residing in the area north of the Military Demarcation Line (hereinafter “North Korea”), and entered the Republic of Korea through the Incheon Airport on April 25, 2004 through China, the Lao and Thailand.
G After settlement in the Republic of Korea after February 201, 201, after graduating from the Department of First University, the same year.
6. 9. From around September, 200, the J Team contracting officers of the Seoul Government Office were serving as public officials.
C. G’s female students also entered the Jeju Airport on October 30, 2012, as a Chinese national bridge, and filed an application for protection under Article 7(1) of the Act on the Protection and Settlement Support of North Korean Refugees. On the same day, H, a temporary protection facility under Article 7(3) of the said Act and Article 12 of the Enforcement Decree of the said Act, was admitted to the Korean Joint Examination Center Germany.
H stated the facts charged, such as violation of the National Security Act (espionage) against G in the course of investigation by the Central Joint Examination Center. On January 10, 2013, the National Intelligence Service arrested G as a suspected fact, such as violation of the National Security Act (espionage) and detained on January 13, 2013, and transferred the said case to the prosecutor’s office on the 29th of the same month. On February 26, 2013, the prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office prosecuted G on February 26, 2013 as facts charged, such as violation of the National Security Act (espionage), and submitted H’s statement as evidence.
Defendant G was found not guilty of the violation of the National Security Act (the crime of espionage, etc. was all acquitted, but North Korean defectors are protected and settled even if they are not North Korean defectors.