The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the grounds for appeal, the punishment imposed by the court below (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, in light of the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the defendant, and that the defendant is at the position to support his/her family.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, the instant crime was committed by the Defendant who habitually stolen the 14.3 million won sum of the shares owned by the victim D, and the case was not somewhat weak in light of the form of the instant crime, such as intrusion upon the ship and the steering house at anchor at the wharf, etc., and the Defendant repeated the instant crime even though he had the past been punished several times of the same crime (eight times of imprisonment and two times of suspended sentence of imprisonment). The Defendant failed to reach an agreement with the victim by failing to repay damage to the victim until now, taking into account all such circumstances as the Defendant’s character, conduct and environment, the background and consequence of the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, and thus, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.