The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the following: (a) the gist of the grounds for appeal: (b) the confession and reflect of the Defendant; (c) the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes without checking the living conditions of the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant agreed with the victim AC, Y, Ast, Q, AP, and AI that the said victims do not want the punishment of the said victims; and (d) the Defendant is at the location of supporting the Defendant’s wife, such as the wife suffering from yellow disorder (two years of imprisonment), the punishment sentenced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Taking account of the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, each of the instant crimes was committed by the Defendant habitually from April 18, 2013 to October 23, 2013, with a total amount of KRW 37,877,200 from 28 victims’ 27 times, and was attempted to steals or steals property amounting to KRW 37,87,200, and damaged the said car with the victim H’s roof in the course of escape after theft. The Defendant tried to receive the payment of purchase price of one half of the two pieces by presenting that the credit card was stolen from the victim’s K operator bank as if the Defendant was a credit card with legitimate right to use. The Defendant was sentenced to KRW 1,278,00 by paying the purchase price of one half of the victim’s N operation in the same manner, and the Defendant was removed from each of the instant vehicle without any change of the market price or of KRW 1,278,000,000 from each of the instant vehicles without permission.