beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, and for one year, for Defendant B.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (Larceny) in Daegu District Court and its Daegu District Court on August 11, 2009, and was sentenced to three years and six months on November 25, 2012, and the same kind of power has seven times more than the completion of the sentence.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Defendant A
A. At around 01:00 on February 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) extracted a yellow pond from F operated by the victim E in North Korea-gu at the port of port with B, which was located in front of the entrance of the entrance at the port; and (b) intruded into the door by breaking the suck door; and (c) stolen 16 tools, such as drums, bridges, etc., 100, and 2,881,000, total market prices of two electric wires, including 2,80 won; and (d) attempted to steals or attempted to steals property owned by the victims over 11 times during the period from January 2, 2015 to April 11, 2015, as indicated in the attached list of crimes.
Accordingly, the defendant was habitually and habitually committed a theft or attempted to steal the victims' property.
B. Around 05:00 on May 31, 2014, the Defendant found the amount equivalent to KRW 900,000 of the market value of Samsung G Ggal ju, which was lost by the victim I, in front of the H road located in Nam-gu G at port.
The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.
C. At around 05:00 on July 6, 2014, the Defendant acquired an amount equivalent to KRW 500,000,000 at the gallon market price of Samsung L, which was lost by the victim L in front of the gallon road of K pharmacy in the K-siJ at Port and Port.
The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.
2. Defendant B.