logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.01.11 2016고단703
업무상배임등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Criminal intent (Joint Crimes by Defendants)

1. On May 26, 2015, the Defendants conspired in collusion to dismiss the representatives of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council for Residents' Representatives, including victims E, and there was no legitimate resolution of dismissal of the representatives of each Council for Residents' Representatives. Without any objective ground that there was a flexible situation between the management service company and the representatives of each Dong, the Defendants publicly announce that “public announcement of dismissal of all representatives of each building by consent of occupants, etc.” under the title “public announcement of dismissal of all representatives by each building by consent of occupants, etc.” as the title “public announcement of dismissal of all representatives by each building by consent of occupants, etc. exceeds the criteria for dismissal under the law.”

It recognizes that the status of attachment is between the management service company and the representatives of each Dong.

When the individual heating works are performed, the victims’ honor was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by posting a paper printed materials on the D apartment bulletin containing the false contents that “the occupants incurred management expenses and incurred losses to the occupants, etc. for refund of KRW 65,000,000,000,000.”

2. On June 2015, the Defendants: (a) discovered, in collusion with the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Officer, that the document attached on the front door of the apartment hall in accordance with the resident representative meeting resolution by the resident representative meeting, stating that “the Defendant A was working as the president of the former resident representative meeting, who caused considerable damage to the housing law and management expenses; and (b) caused considerable damage to the management expenses; and (c) the Defendant A sent the above notice in red form as “the agenda of the FF of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the document stating the details of the lawsuit in front of the resident representative meeting; and (d) the representative clearly stated the contents of the contract for the defective business entity; and (d) in red color on the back of the document stating the details of the lawsuit in front of the resident representative meeting.”

arrow