logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.05.15 2017고단1104
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2016, the Defendant would pay 25% of the amount withdrawn on the face of the account by lending it to the account in order to achieve tax evasion by encashing the proceeds of sports earth.

Upon contact to the purport that “A”, the Defendant’s name account number (C) was known to the needy person and was received from KRW 800,000 to KRW 240,000 per day and was made to withdraw money from the said account, and the said account was known that money deposited in the said account was not money normally acquired, such as criminal conduct.

On December 5, 2016, 10:20 on December 5, 2016, the person whose name was unknown is the Seoul Central Prosecutor E-Inspection.

In order to prevent additional damage because the name of the victim was stolen, it is possible to safely keep and return the money in the passbook.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the person who was not the Seoul Central Prosecutor's Office was not a prosecutor, and there was no intention or ability to return the above money.

Nevertheless, the above-mentioned person was transferred to the above bank account in the name of the defendant at around 13:43 on the same day from the damaged person.

Although the Defendant knew of the fact that the money deposited in the above Korean bank account in the name of the Defendant was not the money normally acquired, the Defendant: (a) withdrawn the total of KRW 8 million in cash at the central point of the Korean bank located in 104,000,000 won, one sheet of KRW 18,000,000,000,000 won, from the central point of the Korean bank located in 13:56 on the same day; and (b) granted the money to the person under whose name the money was waiting before the bank, thereby facilitating the Defendant to acquire the money that he received from the person under whose name the money was remitted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made in the police statement protocol with D;

1. Man million won;

arrow