A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 5, 2018, the Defendant issued a proposal to withdraw and deliver the money deposited in the Defendant’s account from a person without the name who planned to commit the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the

A person whose name is unknown shall be called the victim D at the same place on the same day and shall be called the "F investigator and G prosecutor with the central EM in Seoul.

The two bankbooks were opened in one’s own name, and used in the case No. 2017 high 6006, and the victim’s account was required to read the cash flow for the source of money deposited in the victim’s account. As such, it was false to the effect that “the remittance of money to the post office account (C) in the name of the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service.”

However, in fact, the name-dissected person was not the Seoul Central District Prosecutor and the prosecutor, and the victim transferred money to the above account under the name of the defendant, and the victim was thought to withdraw it and use it in the Bosishing organization.

Nevertheless, as above, the person who was dissatisfying from deceiving the victim and transferred KRW 54 million to the above post office account under the name of the defendant from the same date to the June of the same month, and the defendant withdrawn KRW 54 million over several occasions from February 5, 2018 to June of the same month in accordance with the direction of the non-satisfying person.

Accordingly, the defendant provided an account number and released the money acquired by deception for the purpose of a person who was not aware of the fact that he committed a fraud, thereby facilitating the fraud of a person who was not guilty of the above name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of reply statutes to requests for the provision of financial transaction information;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 347 of the choice of punishment.