logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.12.13 2018고단3522
보험사기방지특별법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant may benefit from traffic accident insurance only when he/she is a person registered as a driver of the victim's automobile insurance, who is the victim of Hyundai Sea Commercial Reinsurance Co., Ltd. B's 2.2 tons of Plostma clor, and the said automobile insurance is driving at least 30 years of age.

Defendant C (23 years of age) had an employee of less than 30 years of age received insurance as if he/she had driven a traffic accident with the foregoing vehicle, and had the intent to recover the damage caused by the accident.

1. On March 23, 2018, the Defendant: (a) called the victim’s counselor to “the victim’s company counselor caused a traffic accident while driving a vehicle with the aforementioned width stringr; and (b) received a false insurance contract by phoneing the victim’s counselor to “the victim’s company counselor caused a traffic accident while driving a vehicle with the aforementioned width stringr.”

As above, the defendant deceivings employees of the victim company and caused the victim to pay 6,300,000 won of insurance management costs to the victim of the traffic accident, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the same amount.

2. On April 9, 2018, around 15:45, the Defendant: (a) called the victim’s counselor in order to recover from damage caused by internal insurance handling during driving while driving a motor vehicle in the remote distance of the Eup-Myeon-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri

As above, the defendant deceivings employees of the victim company and caused the victim to pay 21,210,910 won of insurance management costs to the victim of the traffic accident, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the same amount.

3. On April 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was driving a motor vehicle in the atmosphere signal signalling at the driver’s attention while driving a motor vehicle in front of the SP inspection station at the intersection of the SP on April 20, 2018, in the vicinity of SP 09:30; and (b) would recover from damage caused by internal insurance management.

arrow