logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.05.15 2014고합43
부동산소유권이전등기등에관한특별조치법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Although the Defendant, in violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Real Estate Ownership Transfer, did not purchase from E the F. F. 298 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”), the Defendant, on February 10, 1995, prepared a false guarantee as if he purchased the instant land from E, and had the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer in the future.

Around June 14, 2007, the Defendant committed the crime of false letter of guarantee: (a) prepared a false letter of guarantee that the Defendant actually purchased and owns the instant land from G from E; (b) prepared a false letter of guarantee by having the guarantor H, I, and J affix sign and seal on the letter of guarantee written as above; (c) submitted a false letter of guarantee prepared by the public official in charge of the public official in charge of the public official in the leisure and viewing of the leisure and reception of the leisure in the Shak-si, Syak-si on August 30, 207, when applying for the issuance of a letter of confirmation.

Accordingly, the defendant prepared and exercised a false guarantee certificate.

B. Around August 30, 2007, the Defendant involved in the crime of false confirmation: (a) around February 10, 2007, the Defendant prepared an application for issuance of the certificate as if the Defendant purchased the instant land from E on February 10, 1995; (b) submitted the false certificate to the public official in charge; (c) on November 8, 2007, the Defendant issued a confirmation from the leisure market by false means; and (d) around December 20, 2007, the Defendant filed an application for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the instant land at the leisure registry located in the SPSdong-dong, which was issued by false means to the public official in charge.

Accordingly, the defendant issued a written confirmation by false means and exercised it.

2. The Defendant is likely to be punished due to the fact that he/she acquired the instant land by falsity, and the registration of ownership transfer concerning the instant land in the future, K, an infant of E, is the subject of punishment.

arrow