logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.05.22 2014고단249
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The defendant shall pay 430,000 won to the applicant for compensation by deceit.

3.2

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 7, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for fraud at the Changwon District Court for two years, and was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment and a fine of one million won for habitual fraud at the Gwangju District Court on January 11, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 30, 2012, the said suspended sentence became null and void, and the execution of each of the said suspended sentence was completed on May 9, 2013.

Around October 6, 2013, the Defendant posted a notice to the effect that “The Defendant would sell the goods to NAFK by accessing NAFK,” even if he/she did not intend or have the intent to sell the goods to another person even if he/she received money from another person,” and that at around 15:53 of the same day, he/she would sell the NAFK to 458,000 won to the victim D who reported and contacted the above writing, and that he/she was remitted 458,00 won to the head of the Tong in the name of the Defendant from the victim.

The Defendant, including this, received a total of KRW 13,601,00 from September 27, 2013 to December 16, 2013 by means of the following methods: (a) from around September 27, 2013 to from around December 16, 2013, and acquired the money by fraud.

On November 27, 2013, the Defendant “2014 Highest 421” means pop-up 30 pop-up boxes with access to the Internet NAVVV3 pop-up 30, by accessing the Internet NAVER in the PC room located in Gwangju Northern-dong.

After posting a letter to sell a baby under the title of "the first-come-served order", the victim F who reported the above notice to the victim F, who made the contact with the above notice, would send the baby to him/her.

However, at the time, the defendant did not have a baby, and the defendant thought to use it as living expenses, etc. by receiving the price from the victim, but did not have the intention or ability to send the baby.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and belongs to it.

arrow