Text
1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.
Purport of claim and appeal
1.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The land indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”) was owned by the State from September 27, 1982, and on June 3, 2004, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on November 11, 2003 in the future. On the same day, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on May 10, 2004 for each of Defendant D and the Plaintiff’s 1/2 shares on the same day.
Since then, the transfer registration of ownership was completed in the third party with respect to part of the shares of Defendant D D D 1/2, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on August 6, 2013 after the Plaintiff purchased all of them in the voluntary auction procedure at the Chuncheon District Court HH.
B. From around 198 to around 1992, Defendant C owns the attached sign board, which is an unregistered building on the instant land, a building not registered on the instant land, 340 square meters on the ground block and prefabricated-type building on (v) part, 340 square meters on the ground block and prefabricated-type timber panel on (iv) part, 91 square meters on the ground assembly-type building on the (v) part, 14 square meters on the ground block, 14 square meters on the (v) part, 14 square meters on the ground block, 95 square meters on the ground brick and prefabricated-type timber panel on the (ii) part, 95 square meters on the ground brick and prefabricated-type timber panel on the (vii) part, and 544 square meters on the ground assembly-type building on the (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant buildings”).
C. Defendant D, as the children of Defendant C, occupies the above part of the ground building.
【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute
As to the facts of appeal, the defendants were led to confession in the first instance court, and the confession was revoked, and each of the above buildings is alleged to be owned by the defendant D, but the following third is asserted:
A. As seen in paragraph (2), the above confession is against the truth, and it is difficult to view it as a result of mistake, and thus, the defendants' assertion of revocation of confession is not accepted). The entries in subparagraph 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, barring any special circumstance, Defendant C shall be the Plaintiff, and the Defendant C shall be the instant case.