1. On March 29, 2017, the Defendant’s report on the change of welfare facilities for the aged and the report on the change of long-term care facilities for the Plaintiffs is not accepted.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. In order to establish and operate a Dental Care Center (hereinafter “instant Medical Care Center”), which is a sanatorium for older persons under the Welfare of Older Persons Act (hereinafter “the instant Medical Care Center”), the Plaintiffs reported the establishment of welfare facilities for older persons to the Defendant pursuant to Article 35 of the Welfare of Older Persons Act, and the Defendant accepted it on May 13, 2016.

The instant medical care center was designated as a long-term care institution pursuant to Article 31 of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act.

At the time, the admission quota was 28 persons, and thereafter the admission quota was increased by 49 persons.

In relation to Article 22(1) of the Enforcement Rule of the Welfare of Older Persons Act for the Reasons for Non-repair of Older Persons, a sanatorium for older persons shall be established with a seating capacity of at least 10 persons (a space of the total floor area of 23.6 square meters per admission person) and according to the guidance for health and welfare programs for older persons (I), 2016, and 115 pages, where a building with a parking lot more than the area of the mandatory parking lot under the Parking Lot Act is changed to a facility for older persons and children, and where a sanatorium for older persons is established by changing the purpose of use to a facility for older persons and children, it shall include only the area of

Therefore, it is possible to change the number of persons only up to 54 persons, depending on 54 persons, when adding up the area of the mandatory parking lot (one lot per 200 square meters of facility area) to the area of the parking lot for the facilities (excluding parking lots) (1 lot per 200 square meters of facility area) or the total floor area (287.49 square meters of 289 square meters of 2938

On March 23, 2017, the Plaintiffs filed a report on the change of medical welfare facilities for older persons and a report on the change of a long-term care institution (hereinafter “the report of this case”) with the purport of increasing the admission quota of the instant medical care center from 49 to 70. The Defendant rejected the report on March 29, 2017 on the following grounds:

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

The plaintiffs filed an appeal with the Gyeonggi-do Administrative Appeals Commission on April 6, 2017, but on June 19, 2017.