A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 3, 2014, at around 00:05, the Defendant: (a) was urged to return home from 112 police officers of Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station B District in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, etc. who was under the influence of alcohol in front of the Han Bank, and was called up to 253, on October 3, 2014, at around 112, the Defendant: (b) was urged to return home from 112 police officers of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo Police Station B District; and (c) he was called up to her “Ne-kick, kick-kick-kick, kick-kick, kick-kick, knick-kick, knick-kick, knick-kick, knick-kick, knicked

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a) or more of the Act on the Suspension of Execution for the following reasons: (b) a confession of a criminal conduct and a mistake is divided; (c) a relatively minor attitude to commit a crime is relatively minor; (d) a person who does not have the same previous type of crime; and