beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.
Reasons
1. While the Defendant was using the same office as A in Uzbekistan, he had been issued by the victim AB and kept in the above office, he had the intent to forge the documents in the name of the victim by forging the documents under the victim’s name using rubber, wurgs and certificates of seal impression.
1. On November 18, 2009, the Defendant: (a) prepared a cash borrowing certificate to the effect that “AC Company AB borrowed KRW 70,000,000 from the Defendant on February 23, 2009 on the due date specified and borrowed from the Defendant on May 23, 2009,” using a computer screen program at an unspecified place; and (b) affixed a seal affixed to the victim’s seal similar to the above rubber operator in the name of AC Company AB at the bottom; and (c) affixed the seal affixed to the victim’s seal affixed at his own discretion by the Defendant.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant has forged a certificate of cash storage in the name of AB, a private document on rights and obligations.
2. On November 18, 2009, the Defendant submitted an application for payment order at the Seogu District Court Branch of Seogu District Court 230-10, Yongsan-dong, Daegu District Court, Daegu District Court, which had been located in Yongsan-dong 230-10, to the above court employees who are not aware of the forgery of the document, attaching the forged cash storage certificate as stated in paragraph (1) as if the document was duly formed.
In this respect, the defendant exercised a forged cash custody certificate.
3. The Defendant attempted to commit fraud, at the time and place under Paragraph 2, prepared an application for payment order as if the Defendant had a claim for a loan of KRW 70,000,000 against the victim AB, and submitted it to the above court, such as Paragraph 1.
However, there was no fact that the defendant lent 70,000,000 won to the victim as above.
As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the above court, intended to receive KRW 70,000,000 from the victim, but the victim was above.