1. The plaintiff's liability to pay damages to the defendant for an accident stated in the attached Form does not exist.

In a lawsuit seeking confirmation of existence of a pecuniary obligation, if the plaintiff, who is the debtor, has made a claim to deny the fact that the cause of the obligation occurred by specifying the claim first, the defendant, who is the creditor, bears the burden of proving the facts that

(See Supreme Court Decision 97Da45259 Decided March 13, 1998). There is no dispute between the parties, or there is a fact that the Defendant purchased a lighting fixture manufactured by the Plaintiff and installed in the room where the Defendant was in his/her operation, around January 2019, and around April 23, 2019, the above lighting fixture fell into the Defendant’s inner part and fell into the Defendant’s inner part, and there is an accident listed in the attached list where the Defendant was in his/her inner part (hereinafter “instant accident”).

However, it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant did not install the above lighting fixture in accordance with the operating manual, and that the evidence alone submitted by the Defendant was caused by the defect of the lighting fixture or the Plaintiff’s negligence.

Therefore, there is no obligation of the plaintiff to compensate for damages against the defendant due to the accident of this case, and since the defendant contests it, the plaintiff has a benefit to seek confirmation.

Therefore, we decide to accept the plaintiff's claim and it is so decided as per Disposition.