beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is the representative of a child-care center C in South-gu, South-gu, Seoul, and D is an employee registered as a member of a child-care center with the husband's interest.
1. No person who violates the law of the branch of a child shall commit any physical abuse against a child or injure his/her physical health and development, or commit any emotional abuse detrimental to the mental health and development of the child;
Nevertheless, from around 13:43 to around 13:46 on February 9, 2017, the Defendant was divided into “E” of the above C Child Care Center from around 13:3 minutes to around 13:46, and the Defendant was divided into two parts, namely, the victim F ( South, the third years old) who is a child in childcare, and the victim’s arms who is a child in childcare, and the Defendant was able not to do so, and the Defendant was able to do so.
Accordingly, the defendant committed physical abuse against the victim.
2. A person who establishes and operates a child care center in violation of the Infant Care Act shall install and manage closed circuit television for the safety of infants and the security of a child care center, such as prevention of child abuse, and shall take technical, administrative and physical measures necessary to ensure stability, such as formulation of an internal management plan and keeping access records, so that video information on closed circuit is not lost, stolen, leaked, or damaged;
Nevertheless, the Defendant did not take any measures to ensure the stability so that the video information of closed circuits installed in the above childcare center is not damaged, and the Defendant, at around February 17, 2017, made it possible for the Defendant, at the above childcare center counseling office, to delete all of the video information stored therein and video information of the previous video recording.
Accordingly, the Defendant damaged video information of closed circuit television.
Summary of Evidence
1. The witness G and the witness H, respectively.