Text
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 96,295,015 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its amount from June 5, 2016 to August 18, 2017.
Reasons
1. The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed to exist;
A. On August 1, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for a construction project between the Plaintiff and the Defendant (hereinafter “instant facilities”) with the Defendant’s factory located in the following cities: (a) the equipment that produces the poles, telegramss, and files and concrete files (hereinafter “instant equipment”).
2) The concrete inputs constituting the concrete inputs (hereinafter “instant concrete inputs”).
) Production and installation works (hereinafter referred to as “production and installation works of the instant concrete puts”).
The contract amount of KRW 132,00,000 (including value-added tax) and the construction period from August 1, 2014 to October 31, 2014 were determined and paid. The contract was concluded to receive KRW 52,80,000 for the contract amount at the time of concluding the contract, KRW 39,60,000 for the input of materials and KRW 30% for the completion of the contract, and KRW 39,600,000 for the completion of the construction and submission of securities (hereinafter “instant contract for construction”).
(2) On October 23, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to receive KRW 49,500,000 (including value-added tax) on the contract amount, and from November 10, 2014 to December 22, 2014, the contract amount is 40% of the contract amount at the time of entering into a contract and submitting performance securities, and KRW 30% of the contract amount at the time of completing the construction work, 80,000, KRW 14,850,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 300,850,000, KRW 304,000,000, KRW 304,000,000, 850,000, 304,000,000, 304,850,000, 304,000,00 securities.
(3) On October 24, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the instant construction contract (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction contract”). On October 24, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) Crerecin (the wire network type 1, 2 floor Creciners), 3 new type Creciners (on the speed of driving), 4 Central Crecins (on the speed of driving/driving), 5 shape Crecins (on the speed of driving); and (b) 1 through 5 type Crecins in the instant case (hereinafter referred to as the “Crecins”).
[C] Remodeling Construction Works [180m, C. 180m, C.