logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.07.21 2015고단1479
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 02:10 on March 13, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement) driving a DNA high-speed car while under the influence of alcohol in front of Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu Seoul.

On March 13, 2015, the Defendant received a report on a drunk driving due to reasonable grounds to recognize that he was driven while under the influence of alcohol, such as string, face, red, and smelling, and received a report on a drunk driving, and rejected a request for a alcohol alcohol measurement on three occasions from around 02:27 to March 13, 2015 from E in the Seoul Seongbuk Police Station and from around 03:07 on March 13, 2015.

As a result, the Defendant did not comply with the demand of police officials E for a alcohol test without any justifiable reason.

2. On March 13, 2015, the Defendant, at around 02:50 on March 13, 2015, received a report on drunk driving in front of Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, and received a alcohol test as prescribed in paragraph (1) from the Seoul Seongbuk Northern Police Station and the traffic situation E in front of Seongbuk-gu, and received the above E face by putting the above E in good hand and scam.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers E on the crackdown on drinking driving of police officers, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim E on an external escape that requires approximately 45 days medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Report on the status of the driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation [the scope of recommending punishment for injury].

arrow