logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.01.11 2016고단4942
화학물질관리법위반등
Text

[Defendant A] The sentence against the defendant shall be imposed one year of imprisonment.

However, the above punishment for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The position and role of the Defendants

A. Defendant E as the actual operator of K, and around March 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) contracted to perform the construction work for the opening and repair work inside and outside of the Fju factory Dong (hereinafter “instant construction work”); (b) reported to C and D on a daily basis the construction site manager of the Fju factory, including removal of the internal luminous light lamps production facilities, etc. of the Fju factory from F (hereinafter “F”), excluding the case where Defendant F is the Defendant.

B. Defendant A served as a representative director of F from December 1, 2014, and overall control over the business of the said company.

(c)

Defendant

B The Defendant joined F on April 22, 1985.

The Defendant, as a general manager (department) for the transfer of FF warehouse from Suwon to Gwangju, was reported by C, who was stationed at the construction site, as a general manager for the transfer of FF logistics center.

(d)

Defendant

C On December 10, 2009, the Defendant entered the F and carried out the business related to wastewater, atmosphere, and waste of the Gwangju Factory as the manager of the Gwangju Factory environment from June 2012 to March 2015. At the time of the instant construction, the Defendant, as the vice head of the said company, was in charge of the management and supervision of the construction site at the construction site of this case and was in charge of the management and supervision of the construction site at the construction site of this case.

E. Defendant D joined the M Group, a mother group of F on September 3, 1995.

As the director of the technical management office of the above group, the defendant has been in charge of technical review of the scope of the construction project of this case, the construction amount, the method of construction, the selection of the construction company, and the safety issues that may occur during the construction.

2. Decision on the transfer of F logistics warehouses and the renovation and repair work of Gwangju Factory;

A. Since F’s decision to transfer the F’s logistics warehouse and the conclusion of the construction contract with K and K, F acquired the Gwangju factory from N around 2004, the number of the foregoing factories is the same.

arrow