logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.12.05 2014고정897
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On 14:40 on 01. 06. 06. 14:0, the Defendant was driving a C TLXG car, and the Defendant was driving straightly in accordance with the first two-lane road in front of the Hoyang-dong Hoon High School in Hoyang-dong, Hoyang-dong.

Since there are 30 km points at every time a children protection zone is established, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to observe the speed of limitation within a children protection zone and to drive while paying attention to the safety of children.

Nevertheless, the victim D (Nam, 10 years old) who was going on a bicycle on the left side of the proceeding direction due to negligence that neglected the speed of the restricted speed more than 6 km every hour, and neglected to do so, and did not find out the victim D (Nam and 10 years old) who was going on a bicycle on the left side of the front side of the Defendant's driver's vehicle.

Therefore, the above victim suffered a variety of cages, including cage cages that require approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Investigative reports and investigation reports (in two reports);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Since children of black stuffs are lacking in their ability to see their situation and ability to think of danger and they are able to see and move up without considering any danger, more attention should be paid to them in terms of ordinary cases in children protection zones. Furthermore, the place where this case occurred is a place that prevents a crosswalk even within children protection zones and such place passes through such a place, the driver is required to pay a high level of attention, such as delayed speed and preparation for a sudden appearance of children.

However, according to the black image, it seems that the vehicle driven by the defendant was driven at a very rapid speed, and it appears that it was driven without speeding the speed limit and crosswalk near the point of occurrence of this case even after the passage.

arrow