beta
Text
1. On April 12, 2013, the Defendant’s refusal to recognize the Plaintiff as an additional wife is revoked.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On March 28, 198, the Plaintiff entered the Army and served as a noncommissioned officer from July 16, 198 to B B as a noncommissioned officer, and was discharged from military service on September 27, 1990.
B. On November 1988, the Plaintiff: (a) caused a crashed accident during the training, and entered the injury and disease of “the first half of the calendar, the first half of the calendar, the first half of the calendar, the first half of the chronic base, the first half of the chronic base, and the second half of the calendar; (b) on April 2004, the Defendant recognized the injury and disease related to official duties; but (c) on the other hand, the degree of the injury and disease was determined to fall short of the different grade of the former Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (amended by Act No. 9079, Mar. 28, 2008); and (d) on November 19, 2010, the Defendant recognized the injury and disease of the first half of the calendar during the physical examination procedure as “the first half of the first half of the calendar, the second half of the first half of the first half of the year, and the second half of the second half of the year.”
C. On June 15, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional registration on the ground that the instant injury or disease was not recognized as having occurred in the course of performing military duties or education and training (hereinafter “instant disposition”). Around June 15, 2012, the Plaintiff made a disposition not recognizing the injury or disease as additional measures (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 7, 12, Eul No. 1, 7, and 8, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the plaintiff is faceed during the period of return of the fee when he received a special unexamined training for North Korea around October 1988 after entering the plaintiff.