The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Around March 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was the head of the business team of a corporation C located in Young-gun, Young-gun; (b) retired, dismissed, or reinstated from around 2016; and (c) the said company had repeatedly conducted an act, such as selling another company’s products; and (d) the Defendant did not allow the Defendant to enter the factory operation.

피고인은 회사에서 자신에게 공장동 출입문의 비밀번호를 알려주지 않자 2018. 3. 12. 15:20경 그곳 직원인 피해자 D(여, 34세)이 회사 공장동으로 들어가는 것을 보고 피해자를 따라 공장동 안으로 들어가려다 공장동 출입문 부근에서 피해자로부터 나가 달라는 요구를 받으며 제지당하자 손으로 피해자를 밀어 피해자가 바닥에 밀려 넘어지면서 다리를 헛딛게 하였다.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, who is in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment, such as the sacrine dynasium and tension.

2. Although the Defendant and his defense counsel wanted to enter a factory operation, they did not inflict an injury by having the Defendant go beyond the victim’s body while fighting with the victim was fighting.

3. In light of the judgment, there are statements made by the police of the victim as well as the statements made by the police in this court, statements made by E in the police, damaged photographs, and written diagnosis of injury.

However, the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the record, i.e., (i) the victim stated at the investigative agency that “the victim was unsatisfing about 5 to 10 minutes by satisfing the sating the satisfing over the Defendant,” but at the scene of the crime, the public official F at the scene of the crime stated in the police and this court that “if the Defendant is unsatfed against the victim because satfe the victim, but the victim is unsatfed against the victim,” and (ii) E goes beyond the police after the victim was sealed by the Defendant.