Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. From January 7, 2014, around 19:35, the victim D’s crime committed against the victim D, the victim was defective at the “F” restaurant operated by the victim D, Nam-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul, for the victim to refuse to sell alcohol to the defendant. The victim took a bath to the victim, “I want to die within the meaning of liquor, I want to kill, I do not perform a funeral if I want to do so within the same year.” The victim took a bath to the victim, and the victim’s horse G, who took the bath, by “Ilve to swelve it,” and “Ilve to swel with it,” and was unable to enter the restaurant business of the victim by force over about 10 minutes.

2. Around January 19:00 on January 7, 2014, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim H: (a) franshed the victim H in Y in Y in Y of the operation of the victim H in Y in Y of Y in Yacheon-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) the victim refused and continued to engage in multi-faceted business; (c) the victim, as he/she would be her in his/her hand, her hand, and her hand, she took a bath to the victim and the customer; (d) the victim 3 of his/her customers who were in his/her place, she took a bath to the victim and the customer, she took a bath to the victim, and interfere with the victim’s multi-faceted business by force over about twenty (20) minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of D, H and K, and the statement of G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs and investigation reports (Supplementary to K cafeterias);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, he/she again commits the instant crime even though he/she had been sentenced to a similar criminal attitude, he/she shall be subject to strict punishment in light of the fact that he/she was a repeated crime at the time of the instant crime.