A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On April 11, 2013, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties at the Seoul Southern District Court, and a summary order of KRW 5 million as a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties at the Seoul Southern District Court on August 6, 2013.

【Criminal Facts of Crimes】 around 02:07 September 1, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the police officer’s bucks and bucks of the police officer, a police officer, who was a police officer of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station F Zone G, who was a police officer of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station, to wear a uniform called on the road after receiving a report from 112 that he/she was able to walk on the road on September 1, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records, etc. and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( normal consideration in favor of the accused among the reasons for sentencing following the suspended sentence);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. is that the Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he/she had the record of punishment for the same kind of crime two times in 2013 as stated in its reasoning, and the nature of the instant crime is not good. However, the Defendant recognized his/her mistake and reflects it, other than the previous conviction, and all of the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, etc., are considered.