The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The C’s statement to the effect that the Defendant purchased philophones from the Defendant related to misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles is not reliable, and the Defendant did not sell philophones to C.

B. The lower court’s sentence on the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. Regarding the assertion of misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles, the court below stated that C purchased phiphones from the Defendant consistently from the investigative agency to the effect that it had consistently purchased phiphones from the Defendant. The specific statement was made from the Defendant on the process of purchasing phiphones, the process of delivering phiphones, etc. ② G purchased phiphones from C also made a statement to the effect that it is considerably consistent with C’s statement as to the situation at which G purchased phiphones from C at the time of receipt of phiphones from C, and the Defendant’s photograph was reported to the effect that at the time of receipt of the phiphones from C. The Defendant’s cellphones were in accord with C’s statement, and it appears that C’s statement was considerably reliable, ③ the Defendant purchased phiphones from the Defendant, and the Defendant did not request C’s purchase of phiphones, but only recognized C’s purchase of phiphones as the same place and place as C’s statement.