1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiffs KRW 7,224,00 per annum from August 24, 2017 to the day of complete payment.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: A project approval and public notice - A project for the development of road planning facilities (road: D, E, and F); G public notice of North-gu, Ulsan Metropolitan City on November 19, 2015; and H public notice of North-gu, Ulsan Metropolitan City on March 17, 2016;

B. The ruling of expropriation made on February 17, 2017 by the Ulsan Metropolitan City Regional Land Expropriation Committee - The target of expropriation is not disputing the Plaintiffs with respect to the 560 square meters of I forest land in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan Metropolitan City.

(The date of expropriation, April 14, 2017, - Compensation for losses: 377,94,000 won (Plaintiffs each 188,972,000 won)

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on July 20, 2017 - Contents of the ruling: 412,272,00 won (Plaintiffs each 206,136,00 won) for compensation for losses, and the fact that there is no dispute or dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 3, Eul’s evidence No. 1-2, Eul’s evidence No. 1-2, Eul’s evidence No. 5-1, 2, Eul’s evidence No. 5-1, 7-1, 2, and 7-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. Determination

A. Since the amount of compensation for losses to be assessed against the land of this case alleged by the plaintiffs is so small that it falls short of a reasonable amount of compensation, the defendant shall pay the difference between the reasonable amount of compensation according to the respective court appraisal and the amount of compensation for losses to

B. Determination 1) The appraisal value of the instant land based on the court appraisal: 426,720,00 won (per 213,360,000 won (per 213,360,720,000 won x 1/2) of the Plaintiff) appraisal and the court appraisal are assessed on the basis of comparative standards by selecting 350 square meters before the J in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu as comparative standard. (C) The appraisal results are the same as those on the comparison of regional factors and other factors, but with respect to the comparison of individual factors, there are different opinions on the comparison of regional factors, but with respect to the comparison of individual factors, (the convenience of traffic is somewhat higher than the comparative standard, natural conditions are equal, and they are heated in terms of land, administrative conditions are heated, and other conditions are equal).