1. The Defendant’s payment on October 21, 2014 to the Plaintiffs as indicated in the separate sheet on the compensation details.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business name and public notice of project approval - Business name: G Housing redevelopment and rearrangement project - Defendant - Project implementer: Defendant - Public notice of project implementation authorization - The 41,907 square meters in Busan Shipping Daegu H on February 20, 2013 - KK of the same public notice on July 2, 2014 and July 30, 2014;

B. Adjudication on expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of the injured Metropolitan City on August 25, 2014 - Land subject to expropriation: The land owned by the plaintiffs located in Busan Maritime Daegu L (hereinafter “each land of this case”) and is indicated in the “subject to expropriation” column of the attached compensation details table.

- Commencement date of expropriation: October 20, 2014

The Central Land Tribunal made an objection on January 22, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “instant objection”) - Compensation for losses: The details of the compensation in the annexed sheet shall be as stated in the “amount of the objection”.

As a result of the commission of appraisal to appraiser M in this court (hereinafter “court appraisal”): The above appraiser selected 195 square meters (use status: detached houses, specific use areas: Class-II general use areas; 2 general use areas; 30 square meters; 40 square meters; hereinafter “the standard land in this case”) as a comparative standard for each of the lands in this case, and assessed the compensation for losses for each of the above lands as shown in the “court appraisal amount” column in the annexed sheet of the compensation details by comparing the time revision, regional factors, individual factors, and other factors.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1-1-6, result of a request for appraisal to appraiser M by this court, purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Although the appraisal or court appraisal of the instant objection against each of the instant lands asserted by the Plaintiffs selected and assessed the reference land as a comparative standard, considering accessibility to the road and surrounding environment, it is more appropriate that the Busan Shipping Daegu N.T. (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s reference land”) is a comparative standard.